XGLUE is a new benchmark dataset to evaluate the performance of cross-lingual pre-trained models with respect to cross-lingual natural language understanding and generation. It’s really very sad. Association for Computational The premise sentences are gathered from a diverse set of sources, including transcribed speech, popular fiction, and government reports. We call this processed dataset QNLI (Question-answering NLI).The Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) datasets come from a series of annual challenges for the task of textual entailment, also known as NLI. Computational Linguistics, 2018. On CB, we achieve strong accuracy and F1 scores of 84.4 and 80.6 respectively. Performance on the GLUE diagnostic entailment dataset, at 0.42 , also falls far below the inter-annotator average of 0.80 reported in the original GLUE publication, with several categories of linguistic phenomena hard or adversarially difficult for top models (). 2017.
2018. 2017. Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. ), an online tool for evaluating the performance of a single NLU model across multiple tasks, including question answering, sentiment analysis, and textual entailment, built largely on established existing datasets.
The platform is model-agnostic; any model or method capable of producing results on all nine tasks can be evaluated.A suite of diagnostic evaluation data aimed to give model developers feedback on the types of linguistic phenomena their evaluated systems handle well.Results with several major existing sentence representation systems such as Skip-Thought Our work builds on various strands of NLP research that aspired to develop better general understanding in models.Multi-task learning has a rich history in NLP as an approach for learning more general language understanding systems.
Some characteristics that can signify that a question is insincere: 2005. if the speaker from the first prompt is uncertain if the second prompt is true or false.
for natural language inference. if the two sentences are not exact paraphrases and mean different things.
To evaluate a system on the benchmark, one must configure that system to perform all of the tasks, run the system on the provided test data, and upload the results to the website for scoring. We also evaluate state-of-the-art NLI models on the diagnostic dataset and find their overall performance to be rather weak, further suggesting that no easily-gameable artifacts present in existing training data are abundant in the diagnostic dataset (see Section Since the class distribution in the diagnostic set is not uniform (and is even less so within each category), we propose using , a three-class generalization of the Matthews correlation coefficient, as the evaluation metric. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural To create a stickier benchmark, we aim to focus SuperGLUE on datasets like Winograd-NLI: language tasks that are simple and intuitive for non-specialist humans but that pose a significant challenge to BERT and its friends.B: And yet, uh, I we-, I hope to see employer based, you know, helping out. coefficient. Taking inspiration from , the model uses a BiLSTM with temporal max-pooling and 300-dimensional GloVe word embeddings trained on 840B Common Crawl. "How do I sell Pakistan? This results in an overall score of 83.8, an improvement of 3.3% over BERT, and a further sign of progress towards models with the expressivity and flexibility needed to acquire linguistic knowledge in one context or domain and apply it to others. Annotation artifacts in natural language inference data. Given a sentence, the task is to determine the sentiment of the sentence. For example, "Did you hear about Olivia’s chemistry test? Your job is to decide, given the situation described in the prompt, which of the two options is a more plausible answer to the question: is a more plausible answer to the question about what caused the situation described in the prompt, is a more plausible answer the question about what happened because of the situation described in the prompt, 2014. Rather, numbers should be compared between models within each category.One notable trend is the high performance of the BiLSTM +Attn model: though it does not outperform most of the pretrained sentence representation methods (InferSent, DisSent, GenSen) on GLUE’s main benchmark tasks, it performs best or competitively on all categories of the diagnostic set.GLUE’s online platform also provides a submitted model’s predicted class distributions and confusion matrices.